For this company, outstanding debts are reported by the Social Security and/or FPS Finance, resulting in a withholding obligation (Art 30bis and 30ter, more information via this link).
Outstanding debts with the Social Security or FPS finances often indicate serious difficulties, especially if the company also has liquidity problems.
This company has already not posted any annual accounts for three consecutive years.
Such companies automatically score -5.
Doing business with such companies is highly inadvisable.
They also run the risk of the courts dissolving them.
Judicial dissolution:
On application by any interested party or the public prosecutor's office, and unless matters are remedied while proceedings are underway, the court of commerce in whose jurisdiction the company has its registered offices can pronounce a company dissolved if it has failed to post its annual accounts for three consecutive financial years.
If the equity drops below 50% of the capital, this is due to the losses carried forward.
It is a serious signal.
Almost half of bankrupt businesses report this negative signal.
(*)
In the previous legislation (before 01/05/2019), this would engage the alarm bell procedure.
As of this observation, the general assembly had to be convened to deliberate on the dissolution of the company or decide in taking on other measures.
When the net assets would fall below 25% of the capital, any interested party may request the dissolution of the company before the court.
(*) Source: Companyweb: results based on our own study into causes of bankruptcies.
Negative returns for two years is a major heads-up to the Court of Commercial Enquiry at the Court of Commerce.
An established business which loses money year in, year out has no future anyway.
New businesses may often show a negative return (high startup costs, low sales at first, ...) but things should clearly be getting better after two years.
Profitability and liquidity together give a good idea of how a company is faring.
| Liquidity | Profitability |
|---|
| + | - |
| + | Healthy | Chronically sick |
| - | Temporarily sick | Dying |
(**)
(**) Source: Handbook "Financial analysis process" by Hubert Ooghe and Charles Van Wymeersch (Intersentia)
A business is liquid if it can meet its short-term payment obligations; if not, it is illiquid.
A liquidity of > 1 is considered very good
(= in theory, this business can pay its short-term liabilities if it realises its current assets).
The way this ratio has changed in recent years is highly significant.
If liquidity falls steadily, this means things are getting increasingly worse, and will end up being unsustainable.
How liquid and profitable a business is gives a good idea of how well it is doing.
| Liquidity | Profitability |
|---|
| + | - |
| + | Healthy | Chronically sick |
| - | Temporarily sick | Dying |
(**)
(**) Source: Handbook "Financial analysis process" by Hubert Ooghe and Charles Van Wymeersch (Intersentia)
